Posted: 10 17 2009 Post subject: sarah larson oops
Their ability to distribute in Australia could well be curtailed if they just provided the uncensored version here via Steam. It's not like the ESRB where it's a voluntary industry body, here it's mandated at a federal level.I actually don't mind ratings. If they're consistent and they make sense to begin with I'm all for educating people. It's when it becomes a political football in the name of censorship that it annoys me. Kind of like how in America TV is (was?) time-delayed by a little just in case Janette Jackson slips another nipple during prime time so they can cut the feed or whatever. It serves no real purpose beyond satisfying the requirements of the few that view anything not explicitly within their closeted worldview as being immoral or whatever. Pointless, asinine but apparently worth the expense.
Posted: 10 16 2009 Post subject: does ryan seacrest have any brothers or sisters
Actually, LJ got what he wanted. Now he has a chance to go to a different team and resurrect his career
"Buy low voltage RAM. Some processors will be damaged if the RAM’s voltage is too high and buying low voltage RAM generally doesn’t cost anything more than RAM with higher voltage. This will also ensure that your rig will be able to take on new series of processors."lol.... the dude has no idea what he's talking about. I wonder if he realizes that your CPU and RAM run on different voltages? Low-voltage memory is for saving every bit of power you can or allowing you to get fairly large over clock gains when you apply "normal" voltage.
Posted: 10 12 2009 Post subject: ryan phillippe naked
Judging by his comment history, I doubt he is even old enough to work yet.?
None of the bills before Congress is designed to give free medical care to people who can afford it. It's designed to allow people who can't afford it, to have it, only partly through subsidies, in a way that isn't burdensome to the rest. You really need to learn all the exact specifics on funding in the bills, instead of the vague notions that you currently have.As for using the impracticability of the US saving everyone in Africa as a reason for why the US shouldn't help anyone within the borders of the US who needs it but can't afford it: do you really believe this is a rational argument to support your point?
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum